While one could argue that Fable III removed some of the complexities, this is not necessarily a bad thing-for example, by preventing players from updating their health and armour, the player must always be cautious in engaging in certain super-battles like in Reaver's Arena, as opposed to in Fable II, where massive health bars and health-gaining augments make battle a simple, tedious exercise. If it isn't clear, while I recognize that Fable II is a fantastic game and perhaps a better sequel to Fable, I think that Fable III is the better game (and, in fact, one of my favourites).

The point is that Will is being forgotten, which I think makes Fable's world unique and stands out among the boring, repetitive world of fantasy worlds that are all magical, all medieval, all inhabited by the same beasts, and all.the same.Īlso, how do you lose a scroll in Aurora if you're in Bowerstone? I don't visiting Aurora? Additionally, the forces of the Darkness and even Mercenary Leaders seem to use Will, just as only Spire Soldiers and Spire Guards used Will in Fable II. This is, after all, a forum.įirstly, in addressing your self-labeled 'rant'-first, there are many Will powers in Fable III, what with the ability to combine powers in Spellweaving for a unique effect.

I believe that this subject has been tackled numerous times by 'What is your favourite Fable game?' type discussions, but unless this forum is therefore deemed unnecessary and deleted, I will jump on this opportunity to express my viewpoint.

Fable 3 vs fable 2